Bureaucrats successfully stifle medical cannabis research.

Last week, Dr. Lyle Craker of the University of Massachusetts, after a decade of trying to gain permission to grow or procure cannabis for research on its medical value, finally gave up. Unlike any other substance, the government maintains a total monopoly on growing and distributing cannabis for research purposes. Essentially the government allows no research on cannabis, especially investigations into its medical benefits, the focus of Dr. Craker’s research.

For more history of University of Massachusetts professor’s 9 year struggle, see the AP report here.  This dismal tale of bureaucratic injustice seemed more hopeful in 2007, when a federal judge ruled in Professor’s Craker’s favor and recommended the DEA grant the request. But then this judgment was overruled by the DEA‘s acting director Michele Leonhart in the waning days of the Bush administration. Obama’s response back-stabbed those who voted for change when he then nominated this DEA hack as director, a position which she now holds after unanimous Senate confirmation. Gag.

The government’s actions, and decades of stalling inaction, are crimes against humanity.  Dr. Craker says this is only the first battle and the struggle will continue for many decades. Problem is, those who need the new medications the most, the Baby Boomers, don’t have a lot of decades left to wait while bureaucracies stall research that would further undermine their palace of lies. Lies such as  the Schedule I assertion that cannabis has no medical value. Baby Boomers will be consumed by cancer, blinded by glaucoma, paralyzed by multiple sclerosis, racked by  Crohn’s disease and suffer other dire maladies for which cannabis medications show great promise while self-serving government bureaus continue to lie, to stall and to stifle research.  Such despicable behavior and horrendous consequences, especially when the anti-cancer promises of cannabinoids remain uninvestigated,  truly qualify as crimes against against humanity.

The Obama administration promised a science-based approach. Instead, Obama has allowed politics and bureaucracy to stifle what may well be one of the most productive veins of medical research this century. What if all the tens of billions of dollars wasted on cannabis prohibition and eradication were instead invested in researching medical benefits of cannabinoids? How many jobs could be created? How much suffering could be avoided?  For now, Dr. Craker has lost, along with the American people and scientific inquiry. The bureaucrat prohibitionists and their massive budgets have won. Thankfully, this vital cannabis medical research continues on in other countries.

5 thoughts on “Bureaucrats successfully stifle medical cannabis research.

  1. We can talk about the War on Drugs all we want, but until we wage war on the DEMAND for drugs, there will always be suppliers. No severity of consequence will stop people from making money supplying drugs, so the only effective means to curb this issue is to curb the demand. This means better education about drugs, addiction and alcoholism that must start at an early age and continue throughout life. People forget that addicition isn’t a selective disease – it is a human condition that has plagued our kind for thousands of years.

    But today, things could be different. With electronic media and the ease of communication it provides, we already have the best weapon possible in the War on Drug DEMAND, the question is, when will we start using it?

    There’s an excellent article on curbing demand relative to the War on Drugs here:


  2. All this talk about marijuana use in clinical, scientifiic and even recreational settings is great and I am all for it. I understand and fully recognize that there is legitimate use for this drug – just as there are for other drugs. However, there’s this misconception that exists that marijuana – unlike other drugs – is non-addictive. But this simpky isn’t the case, and there are thousands of people in this country that habitually use marijuana and cannot maintain normalcy without it. While this dependence might not be as severe as that to opiates or cocaine, it is still a problem that needs to be addressed. If we are going to advocate marijuana use, we need to explain this further to people…

  3. Thanks for your publication on this website. From my experience, there are occassions when softening up a photograph may possibly provide the professional photographer with a little an artsy flare. Sometimes however, that soft clouds isn’t what exactly you had as the primary goal and can usually spoil a normally good image, especially if you consider enlarging the item.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *